Generative AI (Gen AI) threats are possible risks and malicious actions that could arise from the application of creative artificial intelligence technologies.
As we navigate through 2024, the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) into our digital frameworks is reshaping not only innovation but also the cybersecurity landscape. While organizations are rushing to adopt these advanced technologies, they face a pressing need to understand the associated security risks. This blog post explores five emerging GenAI security threats that could significantly impact businesses this year, highlighting the importance of preparedness in an increasingly complex digital environment.
While it is not always practicable to figure out exactly where generative AI has been used in a cyberattack, security experts believe it is becoming common in phishing and social engineering attacks. With the introduction of tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and their obvious utility for attackers, “you can assume the increase in maturity and accuracy, as well as the linguistics modification that comes into phishing and social engineering,” said MacKenzie Brown, vice president of security at managed detection and response provider Blackpoint Cyber.
The quick adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) across multiple sectors has created a number of problems for enterprises to solve if they are to successfully minimize risks.
Security Vulnerabilities
Misinformation and Disinformation
Identify fraud and misrepresentation
Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
Cloud Security Challenges
Prompt injection attacks present a serious security concern to large language models. These attacks occur when an attacker creates a prompt that manipulates the model into taking unwanted activities, such as releasing confidential information, executing commands, or generating malicious material. This risk comes from the model’s dependency on user input to provide responses. To reduce this risk, enterprises should implement rigorous access controls, guarantee human monitoring of outputs, and use a zero-trust security model to limit LLM interactions with sensitive systems.
In today’s rapidly evolving cyber threat landscape, the timeframes for potential attacks have drastically shortened. What used to take a day to exploit can now happen within just hours or even minutes. For instance, an attacker who previously needed significant effort to target 100,000 victims can now reach up to 10 million in the same timeframe.
This alarming trend underscores the urgent need for organizations to bolster their defenses and adapt quickly to the escalating scale and speed of cyber threats. This risk stems from the model’s reliance on user-provided instructions. To mitigate these risks, businesses should create rigorous access restrictions, use human oversight for essential outputs, and take a zero-trust posture when dealing with sensitive data and technologies.
Enhanced malware resistance speaks to increased capabilities and measures for preventing, detecting, and responding to malware attacks. To mitigate vulnerabilities, complex security procedures, sophisticated detection systems, and real-time threat intelligence are used. Organizations that implement enhanced malware resistance can better safeguard their systems and data against numerous types of malicious software, lowering the risk of successful cyber assaults.
According to experts, AI-generated code is largely an improved version of existing malware, making it easy to identify with security tools. According to Wisniewski of Sophos, the effectiveness of GenAI technologies for developing malware is restricted. AI-generated code is by and large derivative of existing malware, which generally makes it easy for security tools to detect, according to experts.This includes implementing advanced security protocols, using sophisticated detection systems, and employing real-time threat intelligence to minimize vulnerabilities.
Personalized Attacks occur when an attacker intercepts communication between two parties, usually without their knowledge. The attacker may eavesdrop, change messages, or impersonate one of the parties, resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data.
MitM attacks are typically carried out using tactics such as session hijacking or packet sniffing. To protect themselves against these assaults, individuals and businesses should utilize encryption, secure connections (like Http), and exercise caution when using public Wi-Fi networks.
Several personalized attacks refer to cyber threats that use unique knowledge about individuals to carry out targeted operations. These assaults sometimes include phishing schemes, in which attackers modify their communications based on personal information (such as names or interests) in order to trick victims into disclosing sensitive information.
Other versions may include social engineering tactics, in which attackers take advantage of personal ties or knowledge gained from social media. Such individualized techniques boost the likelihood of success since they resonate more with the intended audience, making them appear more reliable and trustworthy.
Improved audio deep fake news advanced technologies that create realistic-sounding audio that mimics a person’s speech. This advancement makes deepfakes more difficult to identify, potentially enabling fraud, disinformation, or identity theft. Attackers can employ audio deep fakes to create convincing messages, such as impersonating someone over the phone or making fake audio recordings, raising worries about communication security and authenticity.
Criminals can use deepfakes to impersonate individuals in calls or create fake recordings, which raises serious concerns about security and trust in audio communications.
While the technology is still not proficient enough to generate deep fake audio in real time, it will undoubtedly develop, according to Kyle Wilhoit, technical director for threat research at Palo Alto Networks’ Unit 42 division. “I would say down the road, that’s going to be more of a possibility,” said Wilhoit.
Easy vulnerable attacks are cyber threats that exploit prevalent and clearly identified flaws in systems, applications, or networks. These attacks frequently rely on known vulnerabilities that have not been patched or secured, making them available to attackers with basic technical knowledge. Examples include exploiting old software, weak passwords, and unprotected systems. The simplicity of these attacks highlights the need of doing frequent security evaluations and updates to protect against future breaches.
Wisniewski explained that GenAI technologies may now help examine the variants of potential vulnerability exploits, which can speed up the process. “The AI might say, ‘Here’s the promising one.
As GenAI technology advances, so will the accompanying security threats. Organizations must remain aware and aggressive in combating emerging threats such as rapid injection attacks and improved audio deep fakes. Businesses can better protect themselves from potential vulnerabilities by implementing strong security measures, establishing an awareness culture, and updating defenses on a regular basis.
To protect against these vulnerabilities, it’s critical to implement strong security measures, raise staff awareness, and continually update defense plans. Adopting a comprehensive cybersecurity plan will be critical for navigating the changing landscape of GenAI threats in 2024 and beyond.
For more you can view:
https://blogs.idc.com/2024/10/02/the-genai-revolution-five-critical-questions-for-cybersecurity-analytics/
https://www.crn.com/news/security/2024/5-emerging-genai-security-threats-in-2024?page=1
Share this :