Hoplon InfoSec
10 Apr, 2025
One such threat that has garnered significant attention is CatB ransomware. First seen in late 2022, CatB also known as CatB99 or Baxtoy—has become notorious not only for its ability to encrypt files but also for its advanced evasion techniques and multifaceted attack methods. As organizations worldwide ramp up their defences, understanding the intricacies of CatB is essential to counter its potential damage effectively.
Cybersecurity experts have drawn comparisons between CatB and a previously known threat called Pandora ransomware. There are striking similarities between the two strains—ransom notes, encryption methods, and even some operational patterns. These similarities have led many to suggest that CatB might be a rebranded version of Pandora. Rebranding is a common tactic in the cybercriminal world, allowing threat actors to mask their operations under a new name and evade detection systems that have been updated to counter earlier variants.
This type of rebranding is strategically advantageous. By altering the external presentation of the malware, threat actors can bypass updated threat intelligence feeds and security policies designed to recognize older ransomware variants. Consequently, security teams must continuously update their detection techniques and remain vigilant for any subtle changes in malware behaviour.
One of the core reasons for CatB’s notoriety is its sophisticated evasion capabilities. Unlike many conventional ransomware strains that rely solely on file encryption, CatB is designed to be stealthy. It employs advanced mechanisms to detect virtual machine (VM) environments—a common setup used by analysts in cybersecurity labs. If the malware detects that it is running in a controlled environment, it alters its behaviour or halts its execution entirely. This makes analysis, reverse engineering, and the subsequent development of detection signatures much more challenging for security professionals.
At the heart of CatB’s execution strategy lies a sophisticated exploitation technique: DLL hijacking via the Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC). This method leverages a fundamental flaw in how Windows searches for dynamic link libraries (DLLs). Typically, Windows follows a predictable search order when loading DLLs, checking the application’s directory before moving on to system directories.
CatB takes advantage of this predictable behaviour. By inserting a malicious DLL—carefully crafted to mimic a legitimate one—into a location that the operating system searches early, the malware ensures that its code is loaded and executed with the same privileges as the trusted application. This kind of attack is classified under T1574.001 in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a categorization that helps security professionals understand and counter various attack vectors.
Before the malicious payload is deployed, CatB performs extensive reconnaissance. The initial phase involves gathering critical information about the target system. This includes hardware specifications, system drive details, and memory status, all of which are obtained through API calls such as GetSystemInfo, DeviceIoControl, and GlobalMemoryStatusEx. By collecting such detailed information, CatB can tailor its attack to the specific vulnerabilities of the host system and determine if it is running in a VM—thus deciding whether to proceed with the attack.
This initial reconnaissance is a crucial step. It allows the malware to understand the system’s architecture and layout, helping it to evade detection by blending its activities with legitimate system processes. For security teams, understanding these reconnaissance steps is vital in developing early detection methods and response strategies.
Unlike many traditional ransomware strains that focus solely on encrypting files to extort money, CatB has additional capabilities that heighten its threat level. Beyond file encryption, CatB is engineered to steal sensitive browser data and user credentials. This additional functionality means that even if an organization manages to recover encrypted files, the exposure of login details and other personal data can lead to further breaches and identity theft.
By exfiltrating credentials and browser data, CatB effectively expands the scope of its attack from being merely a ransom tool to a more comprehensive espionage mechanism. This dual nature of attack increases the potential fallout from a single infection, as compromised credentials can lead to unauthorized access to financial data, personal information, or even critical business systems.
The impact of CatB ransomware has been substantial, particularly among high-profile organizations. These targets are often attractive due to their high data value and the possibility of larger ransom payments. The multi-stage attack process starts with initial reconnaissance, proceeds to systematic encryption, and is supplemented by data theft, making CatB a multi-dimensional threat. Reports from cybersecurity firms such as SentinelOne and Fortinet have provided detailed accounts of these sophisticated attack patterns.
For example, SentinelOne’s March 2023 report and Fortinet’s February 2023 technical analysis describe how CatB systematically undermines security defences, establishes persistence in compromised networks, and leverages its hybrid attack model. These reports underscore the significant threat CatB poses not only in terms of financial impact but also in the broader context of cyber espionage.
Further complicating the threat landscape, researchers from AttackIQ have identified a connection between CatB ransomware and the suspected cyber espionage group known as ChamelGang (also referred to as CamoFei). This linkage suggests that CatB is not merely a tool for financial gain through ransom but also serves a dual purpose of intelligence gathering. The association with a cyber espionage group implies that CatB could be used to access sensitive corporate or governmental information while the immediate focus is on encrypting data and demanding payment.
The deliberate blending of ransomware and espionage tactics creates a smokescreen. While victims may initially be concerned about the ransom and the loss of access to their files, the underlying objective might be far more sinister—data exfiltration for long-term intelligence purposes. This hybrid approach complicates incident response and makes it critical for organizations to implement both robust backup procedures and effective threat detection systems.
The evolving tactics of CatB demand a corresponding evolution in cybersecurity defence strategies. Organizations must adopt a multi-layered security posture that combines traditional endpoint protection with advanced threat intelligence and real-time monitoring. This means not only having backup systems in place but also actively monitoring for anomalous behaviour that could signal the early stages of a CatB infection.
For instance, security teams should prioritize the detection of abnormal DLL loading sequences—a key indicator of the DLL hijacking mechanism employed by CatB. By implementing robust logging and alerting mechanisms around file integrity and system API calls, organizations can detect suspicious behaviour early on and take proactive measures to isolate affected systems.
A core component of CatB’s execution lies in its exploitation of the Windows DLL search order. When an application starts, Windows looks for DLLs in a defined sequence: it first checks the application’s directory, followed by system directories. CatB exploits this predictable behaviour by planting a rogue DLL with a name identical to a legitimate DLL in a directory that is searched first. Once the operating system loads the malicious DLL, it inadvertently grants the malware the privileges of the trusted application, enabling it to execute malicious code undetected.
This technique is highly effective because it takes advantage of inherent system behaviours rather than relying on software vulnerabilities. As such, mitigating this threat requires a combination of strict access controls, regular audits of DLL directories, and employing file integrity monitoring solutions to detect unauthorized changes.
One practical method to detect potential DLL hijacking involves scanning system directories for unexpected DLL files and verifying their integrity against known good hashes. The following simplified PowerShell script demonstrates one approach to identifying suspicious DLLs:
# Detection of potential DLL hijacking activity
$suspiciousDllLocations = Get-ChildItem -Path "C:\Windows\System32\msdtc\" -Filter "*.dll" -Recurse
$knownGoodHashes = @("hash1", "hash2", "hash3")
foreach ($dll in $suspiciousDllLocations) {
$fileHash = Get-FileHash -Path $dll.FullName -Algorithm SHA256
if ($fileHash.Hash -notin $knownGoodHashes) {
Write-Output "Potential malicious DLL detected: $($dll.FullName)"
}
}This script recursively checks DLL files in the MSDTC directory and compares their cryptographic hashes to a list of known-good hashes. Any DLL that does not match a trusted hash is flagged as potentially malicious. Such detection routines should be integrated into broader security monitoring and automated alerting systems to ensure that any anomalies are promptly investigated.
Beyond detection, organizations should implement prevention strategies to counter DLL hijacking. Some recommended best practices include:
These strategies, when implemented effectively, can greatly reduce the likelihood of a successful CatB infection and limit the damage if an attack occurs.
The impact of CatB ransomware is not confined to small-scale cybercriminal operations; it has increasingly targeted high-profile organizations worldwide. These organizations, often holding valuable data and critical infrastructure, represent lucrative targets for threat actors. The multi-stage attack methodology of CatB—starting with reconnaissance, moving to encryption, and extending to data exfiltration—allows attackers to maximize disruption and extract as much value as possible from their operations.
High-profile targets are particularly vulnerable because the stakes are higher. A successful attack can lead to significant financial losses, reputational damage, and long-term operational disruptions. Furthermore, the espionage angle—where sensitive information may be siphoned off under the cover of ransomware activity—introduces additional layers of risk that can have far-reaching consequences for national security and global business operations.
In response to the evolving threat of CatB, organizations are not sitting idle. Researchers and security firms such as AttackIQ have developed attack graphs that simulate CatB’s tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). These attack graphs allow security teams to test their current defences against a realistic representation of the threat.
Proactive security testing is a crucial component of any robust cybersecurity strategy. By simulating CatB’s behaviour in a controlled environment, organizations can identify weaknesses in their security posture and remediate vulnerabilities before they can be exploited in an actual attack. This proactive approach not only improves immediate defences but also builds resilience against future, similarly sophisticated threats.
One of the most effective ways to combat sophisticated ransomware like CatB is through collaboration and the sharing of threat intelligence. Cybersecurity communities—ranging from governmental agencies to private-sector organizations—are increasingly relying on shared intelligence to keep up with the latest developments. By pooling resources and insights, these communities can develop a more comprehensive understanding of threat actors’ tactics and share best practices for prevention and mitigation.
Many organizations have established formal channels for threat intelligence sharing, and these networks play a vital role in the rapid dissemination of information regarding new tactics such as those employed by CatB. When threat intelligence is integrated into cybersecurity frameworks, it allows for quicker detection, faster incident response, and more effective mitigation strategies.
The hybrid nature of CatB—merging ransomware with espionage—requires a reevaluation of existing security protocols. Traditional security measures often focus solely on preventing data loss through encryption. However, in a hybrid threat scenario, additional layers of defence are necessary. This might include advanced monitoring of network traffic to detect unusual data exfiltration patterns or enhanced endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities that can monitor process behaviour and system modifications in real time.
Organizations must adopt a holistic approach to security that encompasses not only reactive measures but also predictive and proactive strategies. This involves continuous monitoring, regular security audits, and investment in next-generation cybersecurity tools designed to address the multifaceted nature of modern cyber threats.
The emergence of CatB ransomware serves as a wake-up call for the global cybersecurity community. As threat actors continue to evolve, integrating elements of both traditional ransomware and cyber espionage, defenders must adapt quickly to remain effective. The advanced techniques demonstrated by CatB—including sophisticated DLL hijacking, comprehensive reconnaissance, and multi-stage attack methodologies—highlight the urgent need for robust security measures and proactive threat detection.
Organizations are advised to review their current security protocols, invest in advanced detection technologies, and participate in threat intelligence sharing networks. By doing so, they can better anticipate and mitigate the risks posed by emerging threats like CatB. Additionally, continuous security training and awareness for IT teams will help ensure that even as cybercriminals innovate, defences remain one step ahead.
Sources: Cybersecurity News, AttackIQ, Malpedia
Share this :