Hoplon InfoSec
28 Feb, 2025
Recently, a highly advanced cyber attack has been identified that leverages a patched vulnerability—CVE-2024-24919—in Check Point security products. This incident has affected organizations across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, with evidence pointing toward involvement by Chinese state-sponsored threat actors. In this article, we explore the intricate details of this attack, explain the underlying vulnerability, describe the various stages of the attack chain, and offer comprehensive recommendations to mitigate similar threats in the future.
The cyber attack centers on a vulnerability in Check Point’s security gateways—a flaw that, despite being patched, remains a significant risk for organizations that have not updated their systems. The vulnerability, identified as CVE-2024-24919, has a CVSS score of 8.6, underlining its potential for severe impact. Attackers exploited unpatched VPN gateways, critical entry points for many organizations, to breach the perimeter defenses of targeted networks. By taking advantage of systems that had not been updated with the latest security patches, the threat actors could establish an initial foothold in the victim’s network, setting the stage for a multi-layered attack.
Security analysts have observed that the methods employed bear hallmarks of sophisticated, state-sponsored operations. The involvement of Chinese threat actors indicates that the attack might be part of a broader strategy aimed at both espionage and disruption. The geographic spread of the attacks—from Europe to Africa and the Americas—illustrates the global reach of these adversaries and the interconnected vulnerabilities within critical infrastructure sectors, particularly in manufacturing.
CVE-2024-24919 is a vulnerability that affects Check Point Security Gateways configured with IPSec VPN or Mobile Access blades. The flaw permits unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary files from the systems, bypassing key security controls. Although Check Point released a patch for this vulnerability, the attack highlights a recurring problem: organizations often delay updating legacy systems. This delay creates a window of opportunity for attackers, who can exploit known vulnerabilities even after a patch has been made available.
The vulnerability’s high CVSS score of 8.6 reflects the severity of the risk. Once exploited, it enables attackers to access sensitive system information without authentication—a capability that can be leveraged for further exploitation. According to telemetry data, attempts to exploit this vulnerability began as early as April 2024. In many instances, the attackers exploited technical weaknesses and leveraged stolen credentials to authenticate via VPNs, masquerading as legitimate users and evading detection during the early stages of the attack.
The attack unfolded methodically, following a multi-stage process designed to maximize impact while minimizing early detection. The first phase involved the exploitation of unpatched VPN gateways. Many organizations, particularly those in sectors with delayed update cycles like manufacturing, continued to rely on outdated systems. This oversight gave the attackers an ideal entry point into otherwise secure networks.
After breaching the VPN, attackers employed stolen credentials to gain authenticated access. By masquerading as legitimate users, they bypass initial security measures that rely on the trust established by VPN connections. Once inside the network, the attackers conducted thorough reconnaissance, using protocols such as Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and Server Message Block (SMB) to map out the internal network. Their objective was clear: identify critical systems such as domain controllers and escalate privileges to secure administrative access.
This reconnaissance phase also involved identifying endpoints with default hostnames—for example, systems labeled with patterns like DESKTOP-O82ILGG. Such identifiers, standard in many corporate environments, inadvertently assisted the attackers in quickly pinpointing potential targets that followed standardized naming conventions, a technique they had used in previous operations.
A critical component of this cyber attack was the deployment of the ShadowPad backdoor. After gaining initial access through the VPN, the attackers moved to establish a more permanent and stealthy presence within the network. ShadowPad, known for its modular design and flexibility, was introduced via DLL sideloading. This method involved abusing legitimate executables—such as AppLaunch.exe—to load malicious dynamic-link libraries (DLLs) like mscoree.dll. By doing so, the malware could piggyback on trusted processes, significantly reducing the likelihood of early detection by conventional security tools.
ShadowPad’s architecture is particularly alarming due to its support for multiple command-and-control (C2) protocols, including HTTP(S) and UDP. The payloads are encrypted in memory using XOR-based algorithms, which obfuscate the malicious code and enable dynamic decryption during execution. This approach not only complicates forensic analysis but also empowers threat actors with the capability to maintain remote control over compromised systems.
In addition to its sophisticated communication mechanisms, ShadowPad establishes persistence through several means. It modifies critical Windows services and adjusts registry keys to remain active after reboots. The malware also collects and exfiltrates vital system metadata, such as hostnames and private IP addresses, providing attackers with continuous insight into the network’s layout and potential future targets.
In certain instances, the attackers extended the impact of their breach by deploying NailaoLocker ransomware—malicious software designed to encrypt files and extort money from victims. The ransomware is seamlessly integrated into the broader attack chain through the execution framework provided by ShadowPad. NailaoLocker employs robust AES-256-CTR encryption, a standard that is both secure and efficient, ensuring that once files are encrypted, they are nearly impossible to recover without the decryption key. Encrypted files are marked with a distinctive .locked extension, and the ransomware drops ransom notes in the %ALLUSERPROFILE% directory to alert the affected users.
One of the more sophisticated features of NailaoLocker is its built-in logging mechanism for failed encryption attempts. This function not only provides the attackers with insight into the operational status of the malware but also serves as a rudimentary diagnostic tool to ensure that the encryption process is executed flawlessly. Additionally, the ransomware employs a hardcoded mutex, identified as Global\lockv7, which prevents the same system from being reinfected by the malware. Such techniques have been observed in operations linked to Southeast Asian cybercrime groups, indicating that the tactics used in this campaign are part of a broader trend in ransomware deployment.
The dual nature of this attack—combining espionage and extortion—underscores the evolving strategies of modern cyber adversaries. By merging persistent backdoor access with ransomware capabilities, threat actors maximize their leverage over targeted organizations, forcing them to confront not only data breaches and espionage but also the immediate financial and operational disruptions caused by ransomware attacks.
In the wake of such a multifaceted threat, organizations must adopt a comprehensive cybersecurity approach that addresses technical vulnerabilities and procedural shortcomings. The first line of defense is patch management. Organizations using Check Point products must ensure their systems are updated to the latest versions. Check Point has issued specific updates for various product lines, including the Quantum Security Gateway, CloudGuard Network Security, Quantum Maestro, Quantum Scalable Chassis, and Quantum Spark Gateways. Implementing these updates promptly is essential to closing the window of vulnerability.
Beyond patch management, regular password rotation—particularly for LDAP and local accounts—is critical. Organizations should also frequently revoke and regenerate SSH keys to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access. Advanced endpoint protection solutions, such as CheckPoint Harmony Endpoint (version 88.50 and later), can detect unusual process injections. For example, suspicious transitions from processes like svchost.exe to rundll32.exe should be flagged immediately, as these could indicate attempts by malware like ShadowPad to embed itself within legitimate system processes.
Network monitoring also plays a crucial role in early detection. Administrators should implement rigorous logging and anomaly detection systems to monitor RDP and SMB connections, especially those originating from VPN IP addresses. Geographic anomalies—such as logins from locations inconsistent with an organization’s operational footprint—should trigger immediate alerts. Organizations can significantly reduce the likelihood of an undetected breach by maintaining a proactive stance and continuously scanning for irregularities.
Another effective measure is network segmentation. By isolating critical systems and limiting lateral movement, organizations can confine an attack to a smaller network segment, thereby minimizing the overall damage. Implementing multifactor authentication (MFA) and robust access control policies further strengthens the security posture by ensuring that even if credentials are stolen, they cannot be easily misused to gain full network access.
The ramifications of this cyber attack extend far beyond immediate financial losses or data breaches. For many organizations, particularly those in sectors such as manufacturing, the long-term consequences can be devastating. Legacy systems, often burdened by outdated technologies and infrequent updates, are particularly susceptible to exploitation. The continued use of such systems not only increases the risk of cyber attacks but also makes it more challenging to integrate modern security solutions.
For manufacturing companies, the threat is twofold. On the one hand, there is the risk of industrial espionage—where proprietary processes, trade secrets, and critical intellectual property can be exfiltrated and misused by competitors or state actors. On the other hand, the direct operational impact of a ransomware attack can lead to prolonged downtime, disrupted supply chains, and significant financial losses. A short-term disruption can affect a company’s reputation and bottom line in a highly competitive global market.
Furthermore, the attack’s geopolitical dimensions cannot be overlooked. With evidence pointing to Chinese state-sponsored threat actors, this campaign underscores the role of cyber warfare in international relations. As nations become increasingly reliant on digital infrastructure, the security of critical systems becomes a matter of national security. The attack serves as a stark reminder that vulnerabilities in one part of the world can have global repercussions, affecting private enterprises, government agencies, and public services.
The unfolding of the CVE-2024-24919 attack provides several critical lessons for organizations around the globe. First and foremost, it reinforces the necessity of timely and rigorous patch management. The fact that this attack was launched months after a patch was made available illustrates how dangerous even short delays in updating systems can be. Organizations must adopt a proactive approach, ensuring that security updates are applied as soon as they are released.
Another lesson is the importance of network segmentation and strict access control measures. By limiting the movement of attackers within a network, organizations can prevent a localized breach from escalating into a full-scale compromise. Implementing robust monitoring systems and anomaly detection tools is equally essential; these technologies can help identify irregularities, such as unexpected RDP or SMB connections, that may indicate an ongoing attack.
Integrating espionage and ransomware in a single campaign also highlights the evolving tactics of cyber adversaries. In the past, cyber attacks were often aimed solely at stealing information or causing disruption. Today, however, attackers blend multiple objectives—exfiltrating sensitive data while simultaneously deploying ransomware—to maximize their leverage over victims. This hybrid approach forces organizations to address a broader spectrum of threats and underscores the need for a multi-layered defense strategy.
Looking to the future, it is clear that the threat landscape will continue to evolve. Advances in technology will likely give rise to even more sophisticated forms of cyber attacks, making it imperative for organizations to remain agile and adaptive in their security practices. Investments in advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence-driven threat detection and automated incident response systems, are becoming increasingly important. These solutions can analyze vast network data in real-time, identify potential threats before they escalate, and initiate rapid countermeasures to contain any breaches.
Furthermore, the importance of collaboration cannot be overstated. In an era where cyber threats are becoming increasingly global and interconnected, information sharing between organizations, cybersecurity vendors, and government agencies is critical. Such collaboration can help create a unified front against adversaries, enabling a more coordinated and effective response to emerging threats.
The cyber attack exploiting the patched CVE-2024-24919 vulnerability in Check Point systems represents a significant milestone in the evolution of cyber threats. Threat actors have demonstrated sophistication that challenges traditional cybersecurity models by taking advantage of unpatched VPN gateways, leveraging stolen credentials, and employing sophisticated tools such as the ShadowPad backdoor and NailaoLocker ransomware. The incident is a stark reminder of the persistent risks posed by legacy systems and delayed updates, particularly in industries that rely on outdated infrastructure.
Organizations must adopt a comprehensive, proactive approach to cybersecurity that combines timely patch management, rigorous network monitoring, advanced endpoint protection, and strict access controls. By implementing these measures and fostering a culture of continuous vigilance, businesses can better protect themselves against similar attacks in the future. In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, it is not enough to rely on reactive measures; organizations must be prepared to anticipate and counter the multifaceted strategies employed by modern cyber adversaries.
Ultimately, the lessons learned from this attack will play a crucial role in shaping the future of cybersecurity. As threat actors refine their techniques and blend various tactics to achieve their objectives, a resilient defense strategy that emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and proactive risk management will be essential. By staying informed about emerging vulnerabilities and adopting best practices, organizations can ensure they are prepared to face today’s threats and equipped to handle tomorrow’s challenges.
As we move forward, the cybersecurity community must remain committed to ongoing education, rigorous testing, and continual improvement of security protocols. Such sustained efforts can only build a safer and more secure digital environment for all. The battle against cyber threats is far from over. Still, with a comprehensive and adaptive approach, organizations can mitigate risks and safeguard their critical infrastructure against even the most sophisticated attacks.
In summary, the CVE-2024-24919 attack is a wake-up call for organizations around the globe. It highlights the urgent need for timely updates, advanced monitoring, and a collaborative approach to cybersecurity. By learning from this incident and implementing the recommended strategies, businesses can strengthen their defenses, minimize vulnerabilities, and ensure a more resilient operational framework in an increasingly hostile cyber environment.
For more:
Share this :